linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:58:30 -0800
From:   John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
CC:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vardan Mikayelyan <Vardan.Mikayelyan@...opsys.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        "Felipe Balbi" <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

On 1/11/2017 2:39 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com> wrote:
>> On 1/3/2017 11:52 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> Hope everyone had a happy new years!
>>>
>>> I just wanted to send out my current queue of patches for dwc2
>>> controller on the HiKey board for consideration for the 4.11
>>> merge window.
>>>
>>> This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2,
>>> which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init
>>> logic might make unnecssary.
>>>
>>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Do you need these in 4.10-rc or is 4.11 ok?
> 
> So I was submitting these for 4.11.
> 
> The only one which was sort of a regression fix (though introduced in
> 4.9 rather then 4.10) was the "Avoid suspending if we're in gadget
> mode" one, which you seemed to submit for 4.10-rc already.
> 
> Let me know if there is anything you need prior to queuing the rest for 4.11.
> 

Ok. The only one that will have a problem will be patch 5 due to my
recent series [1].

Can you rebase against that?

Patch 1-4 of this series:
Acked-by: John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>

I'll also add these to our 4.11 branch locally as there are a lot of
interdependent changes. I'll send everything at once to Felipe to make
it easier for him.

Regards,
John

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg151693.html