linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:10:41 -0800
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vardan Mikayelyan <Vardan.Mikayelyan@...opsys.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:58 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com> wrote:
> On 1/11/2017 2:39 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2017 11:52 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>>> Hope everyone had a happy new years!
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to send out my current queue of patches for dwc2
>>>> controller on the HiKey board for consideration for the 4.11
>>>> merge window.
>>>>
>>>> This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2,
>>>> which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init
>>>> logic might make unnecssary.
>>>>
>>>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> Do you need these in 4.10-rc or is 4.11 ok?
>>
>> So I was submitting these for 4.11.
>>
>> The only one which was sort of a regression fix (though introduced in
>> 4.9 rather then 4.10) was the "Avoid suspending if we're in gadget
>> mode" one, which you seemed to submit for 4.10-rc already.
>>
>> Let me know if there is anything you need prior to queuing the rest for 4.11.
>>
>
> Ok. The only one that will have a problem will be patch 5 due to my
> recent series [1].
>
> Can you rebase against that?

Do you have a git branch for that series to rebase against?

thanks
-john