[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d8a7eeb-f49a-47eb-1b74-70631c27e931@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:45:08 +0530
From: Shyam Sundar S K <ssundark@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@....com>,
Pankaj Sen <Pankaj.Sen@....com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: avoid maybe-uninitalized warning
Hi Linus,
You have already added patch for the same "[PATCH] pinctrl: amd: fix compilation warning" and applied to one of your fixed branch.
Do you feel this patch needs to be taken ?
Thanks,
Shyam
On 1/12/2017 1:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
>> Since gpio_dev->hwbank_num is now a variable, the compiler cannot
>> figure out if pin_num is initialized at all:
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_dbg_show':
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:210:3: warning: 'pin_num' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>> for (; i < pin_num; i++) {
>> ^~~
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:172:21: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>
>> This adds a 'default' statement to make that case well-defined.
>>
>> Fixes: 3bfd44306c65 ("pinctrl: amd: Add support for additional GPIO")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists