[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZrhrMi4SGa8RCwTzcLQDumEQjpw+LftLNEaxxRAZu8Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:49:52 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@....com>,
Pankaj Sen <Pankaj.Sen@....com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: avoid maybe-uninitalized warning
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Since gpio_dev->hwbank_num is now a variable, the compiler cannot
> figure out if pin_num is initialized at all:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_dbg_show':
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:210:3: warning: 'pin_num' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> for (; i < pin_num; i++) {
> ^~~
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:172:21: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>
> This adds a 'default' statement to make that case well-defined.
>
> Fixes: 3bfd44306c65 ("pinctrl: amd: Add support for additional GPIO")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists