lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:46:34 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [patch v2] mm, memcg: do not retry precharge charges

When memory.move_charge_at_immigrate is enabled and precharges are
depleted during move, mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() will attempt to
increase the size of the precharge.

This can be allowed to do reclaim, but should not call the oom killer to
oom kill a process.  It's better to fail the attach rather than oom kill
a process attached to the memcg hierarchy.

Prevent precharges from ever looping by setting __GFP_NORETRY.  This was
probably the intention of the GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_NORETRY, which is
pointless as written.

Fixes: 0029e19ebf84 ("mm: memcontrol: remove explicit OOM parameter in charge path")
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4353,9 +4353,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_precharge(unsigned long count)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	/* Try charges one by one with reclaim */
+	/*
+	 * Try charges one by one with reclaim, but do not retry.  This avoids
+	 * calling the oom killer when the precharge should just fail.
+	 */
 	while (count--) {
-		ret = try_charge(mc.to, GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_NORETRY, 1);
+		ret = try_charge(mc.to, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		mc.precharge++;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists