[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170113083648.GA22022@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:36:48 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:08:07PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I think we have some inline functions that do asm volatile ("call
> ..."), and I don't see any credible way of forcing alignment short of
> generating an entirely new stack frame and aligning that. Ick. This
A straight asm call from C should always work because gcc keeps
the stack aligned in the prologue.
The only problem with inline assembly is when you start pushing
things onto the stack directly.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists