linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] Style fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170113204834.4941-1-kedrot@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:48:34 -0300
From:   "Guillermo O. Freschi" <kedrot@...il.com>
To:     "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        "lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Guillermo O. Freschi" <kedrot@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Style fixes

Missing braces on `if` statement.

Signed-off-by: Guillermo O. Freschi <kedrot@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
index f4cbc89b4f24..b66bc02646f1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
@@ -1024,11 +1024,11 @@ void ldlm_grant_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct list_head *work_list)
 	if (work_list && lock->l_completion_ast)
 		ldlm_add_ast_work_item(lock, NULL, work_list);
 
-	if (res->lr_type == LDLM_PLAIN || res->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS)
+	if (res->lr_type == LDLM_PLAIN || res->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS) {
 		ldlm_grant_lock_with_skiplist(lock);
-	else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_EXTENT)
+	} else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_EXTENT) {
 		ldlm_extent_add_lock(res, lock);
-	else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK) {
+	} else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK) {
 		/*
 		 * We should not add locks to granted list in the following cases:
 		 * - this is an UNLOCK but not a real lock;
@@ -1040,8 +1040,9 @@ void ldlm_grant_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct list_head *work_list)
 		    ldlm_is_test_lock(lock) || ldlm_is_flock_deadlock(lock))
 			return;
 		ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &res->lr_granted, lock);
-	} else
+	} else {
 		LBUG();
+	}
 
 	ldlm_pool_add(&ldlm_res_to_ns(res)->ns_pool, lock);
 }
-- 
2.11.0