lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:45:38 -0500
From:   Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To:     "Guillermo O. Freschi" <kedrot@...il.com>
Cc:     "lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Style fixes


On Jan 13, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Guillermo O. Freschi wrote:

> Missing braces on `if` statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guillermo O. Freschi <kedrot@...il.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>

Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
> index f4cbc89b4f24..b66bc02646f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
> @@ -1024,11 +1024,11 @@ void ldlm_grant_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct list_head *work_list)
> 	if (work_list && lock->l_completion_ast)
> 		ldlm_add_ast_work_item(lock, NULL, work_list);
> 
> -	if (res->lr_type == LDLM_PLAIN || res->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS)
> +	if (res->lr_type == LDLM_PLAIN || res->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS) {
> 		ldlm_grant_lock_with_skiplist(lock);
> -	else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_EXTENT)
> +	} else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_EXTENT) {
> 		ldlm_extent_add_lock(res, lock);
> -	else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK) {
> +	} else if (res->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK) {
> 		/*
> 		 * We should not add locks to granted list in the following cases:
> 		 * - this is an UNLOCK but not a real lock;
> @@ -1040,8 +1040,9 @@ void ldlm_grant_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct list_head *work_list)
> 		    ldlm_is_test_lock(lock) || ldlm_is_flock_deadlock(lock))
> 			return;
> 		ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &res->lr_granted, lock);
> -	} else
> +	} else {
> 		LBUG();
> +	}
> 
> 	ldlm_pool_add(&ldlm_res_to_ns(res)->ns_pool, lock);
> }
> -- 
> 2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists