linux-kernel - Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c8212f4-05e8-a9c6-b8c0-f516be48f9eb@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:16:32 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers?

On 14/01/17 00:24, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I submitted https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147343473231192&w=2
> a while ago and it was suggested postponing any discussion until
> after ksummit (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-September/003829.html)
> Did any discussion/hacking end up happening? There's interest in
> building more of the tools in Fedora but I'm not excited about
> doing this if more of the tools are prone to header problems.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura
> 
Hi Laura,

I'm afraid I wasn't at the kernel summit, but I haven't had any feedback
on this being discussed, so you are wise to bring it up again.

Ben, did it come up to your knowledge?

If not, I guess we fall back to good old reliable email to discuss it
now.

Jonathan