linux-kernel - Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1484532401.2998.27.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 02:06:41 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers?

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 16:16 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 14/01/17 00:24, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I submitted https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147343473231192&w=2
> > a while ago and it was suggested postponing any discussion until
> > after ksummit (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-September/003829.html)
> > Did any discussion/hacking end up happening? There's interest in
> > building more of the tools in Fedora but I'm not excited about
> > doing this if more of the tools are prone to header problems.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Laura
> > 
> 
> Hi Laura,
> 
> I'm afraid I wasn't at the kernel summit, but I haven't had any feedback
> on this being discussed, so you are wise to bring it up again.
> 
> Ben, did it come up to your knowledge?

Certainly not on the core day, and if it happened some other day then I
missed it.

Ben.

> If not, I guess we fall back to good old reliable email to discuss it
> now.
> 
> Jonathan
-- 
Ben Hutchings
Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)