lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:41:26 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        "Christopher Covington" <cov@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>, <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
        Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, <astone@...hat.com>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Charles Garcia Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
        <rjwysocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver

On 2017/1/16 22:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/01/17 14:07, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 2017-01-03 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
>>> <agustinv@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is there any more feedback on this beyond Lorenzo's suggestion to drop
>>>> the conditional check on the first patch?
>>>> How can we move forward on this series?
>>> Essentially, I need to convince myself that patches [1-2/3] are fine
>>> which hasn't happened yet.
>> Pinging again. Do you have any questions that might help with your
>> review? I have some minor changes I have to make to the driver itself
>> (patch 3) and I'd like to submit any changes you might want along with
>> those.
> I'd like to add that these two initial patches are now a prerequisite
> for Hanjun's series, so it'd be good to have an idea of where we're
> going on that front.

Is it helpful to test patch [1-2/3] on x86 machines (with different firmware) and
an IA64 machine (surely a different version of firmware :) ) with Lorenzo's suggestion
of removing  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI for is_gsi()? If yes, I can do that as
I have such machines.

Thanks
Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists