linux-kernel - Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Veq_kEyghXAwCv8Z6zKTA-mF0bvJnALzm-2C0-dVZs9mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:33:13 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he
>> responsive?
>
> Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December
> and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like.

Good you are here!

>> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
>> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
>> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
>>
>> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
>> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.
>
> I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just
> need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push.

Thanks! It's indeed important to us.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko