linux-kernel - Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170116215851.GA18142@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:58:51 +0100
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he
> responsive?

Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December
and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like.

> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
> 
> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.

I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just
need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push.

"Uncountable" is maybe a little strong, though.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)