lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c4e1c37-1a8e-9e5e-c276-f7bd3cfb248b@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:11:32 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] init/main: Init jump_labels before they are used to
 build zonelists

On 01/17/2017 03:30 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:44:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:07:36PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway I'm not sure if this patch is safe. Hopefully Peter can judge
>>> this better...
>>>
>>>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  init/main.c | 3 +--
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
>>>> index 8b1adb6e..d1ca7cb 100644
>>>> --- a/init/main.c
>>>> +++ b/init/main.c
>>>> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
>>>>  	boot_cpu_state_init();
>>>>  	smp_prepare_boot_cpu();	/* arch-specific boot-cpu hooks */
>>>>  
>>>> +	jump_label_init();
>>>>  	build_all_zonelists(NULL, NULL);
>>>>  	page_alloc_init();
>>>>  
>>>> @@ -526,8 +527,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
>>>>  		parse_args("Setting init args", after_dashes, NULL, 0, -1, -1,
>>>>  			   NULL, set_init_arg);
>>>>  
>>>> -	jump_label_init();
>>>> -
>>
>> Urgh, that means auditing all archs that implement this. The thing
>> you're looking for is if the self-modifying code cruft can be done that
>> early.
>>
>> x86 looks to be fine, because this is after setup_arch() which is
>> required for ideal_nops[] to be initialied and we use text_poke_early()
>> which doesn't really need anything else.
>>
>> I've not gone through the other arches...
> 
> Vlastimil,
> 
> Will you be able to look into that? Openrisc doesnt have jump_label
> support, so its no issue at the moment.
> 
> Archs that do have it:
> 
> arch/arm64/Kconfig:     select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> arch/mips/Kconfig:      select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> arch/s390/Kconfig:      select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> arch/sparc/Kconfig:     select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if SPARC64
> arch/tile/Kconfig:      select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> arch/x86/Kconfig:       select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> arch/arm/Kconfig:       select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig:   select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> 
> I looked at a few (arm, tile) and I dont see their arch_jump_label_transform*
> implementations depending on global state like ideal_nops from x86. They
> should be ok.

Thanks, I'll try.

> If no time, Should you change your patch to not use static keys for
> build_all_zonelists at least?

Yes that would be uglier but possible if I find issues or I'm not
confident enough with the auditing...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ