[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60ed4f02-4ff8-2ef2-bcc3-ae62bc61cda9@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:37:41 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
William Roberts <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/46] selinux: One check and function call less in
genfs_read() after error detection
>> @@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@ static int genfs_read(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
>> newgenfs = kzalloc(sizeof(*newgenfs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!newgenfs) {
>> rc = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto out;
>> + goto exit;
>> }
>>
>> rc = str_read(&newgenfs->fstype, GFP_KERNEL, fp, len);
>> @@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ static int genfs_read(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
>> kfree(newgenfs);
>> }
>> ocontext_destroy(newc, OCON_FSUSE);
>> -
>> +exit:
>> return rc;
>
> Why not replace the "goto out" with "return rc" rather
> than add a target?
Would you accept to use the statement "return -ENOMEM;" there instead?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists