[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55f62ee9-9e98-f5e0-67eb-fc7aa5cbe8f8@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:53:27 -0800
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
William Roberts <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/46] selinux: One check and function call less in
genfs_read() after error detection
On 1/17/2017 8:37 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> @@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@ static int genfs_read(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
>>> newgenfs = kzalloc(sizeof(*newgenfs), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!newgenfs) {
>>> rc = -ENOMEM;
>>> - goto out;
>>> + goto exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>> rc = str_read(&newgenfs->fstype, GFP_KERNEL, fp, len);
>>> @@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ static int genfs_read(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
>>> kfree(newgenfs);
>>> }
>>> ocontext_destroy(newc, OCON_FSUSE);
>>> -
>>> +exit:
>>> return rc;
>> Why not replace the "goto out" with "return rc" rather
>> than add a target?
> Would you accept to use the statement "return -ENOMEM;" there instead?
That would be even better.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists