linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max for non HWP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdcyv9JpZ6Mj_JiftS9r2tQc-Vno05uFpBfQOanGkkY_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 05:24:36 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max for non HWP systems

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 16:32 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:36:34PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

>> intel_bdw_turbo.c
>> CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO
> We should add _MAX_3 as this is a technology more than simple TURBO.
>
> CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO_MAX_3

Would it be re-used in the future?
I would suggest INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko