linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max for non HWP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:31:54 -0800
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max for non HWP
 systems

On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 05:24 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 16:32 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:36:34PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada
> > > wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > intel_bdw_turbo.c
> > > CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO
> > We should add _MAX_3 as this is a technology more than simple
> > TURBO.
> > 
> > CONFIG_INTEL_BDW_TURBO_MAX_3
> 
> Would it be re-used in the future?
> I would suggest INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3
Current direction is to have ACPI CPPC. I am fine dropping BDW.
Let me resubmit patch. Anyway my script missed sending emails to all in
the maintainer list, so have to resend.

Thanks,
Srinivas