[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170118222526.GB24486@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:25:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 033/120] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket
0 assumption in the Haswell init code
* Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
> 4.9 is broken and requires additional patches beyond this patch. Applying this
> patch to 4.9 stable without those additional fixes will result in kernel panics
> on some Haswell systems that boot on random cores.
Could you list the patches that are required? It would be nice to backport all
required fixes to v4.9.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists