[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484737176.2133.191.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:59:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: helper function to detect slave mode
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 01:14 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> review comments then, for example it is not obvious that on a platform
> with both CONFIG_ACPI and CONFIG_OF enabled there should be an
> exclusive
> selection of only one of two possible branches as in your code etc.
ACPI and DT approach differently to this property. Like I already said
to you check GPIO library where we have similarities.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists