| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:45:52 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 034/120] efi/x86: Prune invalid memory map entries and fix boot regression
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
commit 0100a3e67a9cef64d72cd3a1da86f3ddbee50363 upstream.
Some machines, such as the Lenovo ThinkPad W541 with firmware GNET80WW
(2.28), include memory map entries with phys_addr=0x0 and num_pages=0.
These machines fail to boot after the following commit,
commit 8e80632fb23f ("efi/esrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() and avoid a kmalloc()")
Fix this by removing such bogus entries from the memory map.
Furthermore, currently the log output for this case (with efi=debug)
looks like:
[ 0.000000] efi: mem45: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
This is clearly wrong, and also not as informative as it could be. This
patch changes it so that if we find obviously invalid memory map
entries, we print an error and skip those entries. It also detects the
display of the address range calculation overflow, so the new output is:
[ 0.000000] efi: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid EFI memory map entries:
[ 0.000000] efi: mem45: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000000] (invalid)
It also detects memory map sizes that would overflow the physical
address, for example phys_addr=0xfffffffffffff000 and
num_pages=0x0200000000000001, and prints:
[ 0.000000] efi: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid EFI memory map entries:
[ 0.000000] efi: mem45: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[phys_addr=0xfffffffffffff000-0x20ffffffffffffffff] (invalid)
It then removes these entries from the memory map.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
[ardb: refactor for clarity with no functional changes, avoid PAGE_SHIFT]
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
[Matt: Include bugzilla info in commit log]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191121
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/efi.h | 1
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -210,6 +210,70 @@ int __init efi_memblock_x86_reserve_rang
return 0;
}
+#define OVERFLOW_ADDR_SHIFT (64 - EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)
+#define OVERFLOW_ADDR_MASK (U64_MAX << OVERFLOW_ADDR_SHIFT)
+#define U64_HIGH_BIT (~(U64_MAX >> 1))
+
+static bool __init efi_memmap_entry_valid(const efi_memory_desc_t *md, int i)
+{
+ u64 end = (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) + md->phys_addr - 1;
+ u64 end_hi = 0;
+ char buf[64];
+
+ if (md->num_pages == 0) {
+ end = 0;
+ } else if (md->num_pages > EFI_PAGES_MAX ||
+ EFI_PAGES_MAX - md->num_pages <
+ (md->phys_addr >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)) {
+ end_hi = (md->num_pages & OVERFLOW_ADDR_MASK)
+ >> OVERFLOW_ADDR_SHIFT;
+
+ if ((md->phys_addr & U64_HIGH_BIT) && !(end & U64_HIGH_BIT))
+ end_hi += 1;
+ } else {
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ pr_warn_once(FW_BUG "Invalid EFI memory map entries:\n");
+
+ if (end_hi) {
+ pr_warn("mem%02u: %s range=[0x%016llx-0x%llx%016llx] (invalid)\n",
+ i, efi_md_typeattr_format(buf, sizeof(buf), md),
+ md->phys_addr, end_hi, end);
+ } else {
+ pr_warn("mem%02u: %s range=[0x%016llx-0x%016llx] (invalid)\n",
+ i, efi_md_typeattr_format(buf, sizeof(buf), md),
+ md->phys_addr, end);
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void __init efi_clean_memmap(void)
+{
+ efi_memory_desc_t *out = efi.memmap.map;
+ const efi_memory_desc_t *in = out;
+ const efi_memory_desc_t *end = efi.memmap.map_end;
+ int i, n_removal;
+
+ for (i = n_removal = 0; in < end; i++) {
+ if (efi_memmap_entry_valid(in, i)) {
+ if (out != in)
+ memcpy(out, in, efi.memmap.desc_size);
+ out = (void *)out + efi.memmap.desc_size;
+ } else {
+ n_removal++;
+ }
+ in = (void *)in + efi.memmap.desc_size;
+ }
+
+ if (n_removal > 0) {
+ u64 size = efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal;
+
+ pr_warn("Removing %d invalid memory map entries.\n", n_removal);
+ efi_memmap_install(efi.memmap.phys_map, size);
+ }
+}
+
void __init efi_print_memmap(void)
{
efi_memory_desc_t *md;
@@ -472,6 +536,8 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
}
}
+ efi_clean_memmap();
+
if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
efi_print_memmap();
}
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ typedef struct {
#define EFI_PAGE_SHIFT 12
#define EFI_PAGE_SIZE (1UL << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)
+#define EFI_PAGES_MAX (U64_MAX >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)
typedef struct {
u32 type;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists