lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:45:51 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 033/120] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>

commit 6d6daa20945f3f598e56e18d1f926c08754f5801 upstream.

hswep_uncore_cpu_init() uses a hardcoded physical package id 0 for the boot
cpu. This works as long as the boot CPU is actually on the physical package
0, which is normaly the case after power on / reboot.

But it fails with a NULL pointer dereference when a kdump kernel is started
on a secondary socket which has a different physical package id because the
locigal package translation for physical package 0 does not exist.

Use the logical package id of the boot cpu instead of hard coded 0.

[ tglx: Rewrote changelog once more ]

Fixes: cf6d445f6897 ("perf/x86/uncore: Track packages, not per CPU data")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483628965-2890-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *hswep_m
 
 void hswep_uncore_cpu_init(void)
 {
-	int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(0);
+	int pkg = boot_cpu_data.logical_proc_id;
 
 	if (hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
 		hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ