lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:04:01 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Input: Automated coccinelle cleanup On 01/18/2017 05:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 09:46 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> The conversion was done automatically with coccinelle using several semantic >> patches. The semantic patches and the scripts used to generate this commit >> log are available at https://github.com/groeck/coccinelle-patches. > > It'd be better to include the script in this 0/n patch > so that if github entry changes, the 0/n patch is useful. > For this set it would have been possible, though even the rules used here add up to more than 1,000 lines. The underlying larger set (the one I am using to generate devm transformations) currently has ~5,000 lines of coccinelle rules. Are you sure you want to see that in an e-mail ? It might make more sense if I add the reference SHA from the repository. Thanks, Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists