linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/33] Input: Automated coccinelle cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1484802415.18392.2.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:06:55 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Input: Automated coccinelle cleanup

On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 21:04 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 05:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 09:46 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > The conversion was done automatically with coccinelle using several semantic
> > > patches. The semantic patches and the scripts used to generate this commit
> > > log are available at https://github.com/groeck/coccinelle-patches.
> > 
> > It'd be better to include the script in this 0/n patch
> > so that if github entry changes, the 0/n patch is useful.
> > 
> For this set it would have been possible, though even the rules used here add
> up to more than 1,000 lines.

How many errors do you think are in the script?
1000+ lines, likely there 10+ errors/defects.