[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484822772.2133.225.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:46:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] staging: fbtft: convert fbtft_reset() to be
non-atomic
On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 10:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 08:29:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > First of all, fbtft in current state doesn't allow to override GPIOs
> > to be
> > optional, like "reset" one. It might be a bug somewhere, but rather
> > out of
> > scope of this fix.
> >
> > Second, not all GPIOs available on the board would be SoC based,
> > some of them
> > might sit on I2C GPIO expanders, for example, on Intel
> > Edison/Arduino, and thus
> > any communication with them might sleep.
> >
> > Besides that using udelay() and mdelay() is kinda resource wasteful.
> >
> > Summarize all of the above, convert fbtft_reset() function to non-
> > atomic
> > variant by using gpio_set_value_cansleep(), usleep_range(), and
> > msleep().
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Andy, this series came through with the charmap all corrupted and git
> didn't like them at all. Can you fix up and resend?
Strange. I used usual git send-email. Okay, just resent (as v4).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists