[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170119182234.GC30851@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:22:34 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: thomas.lendacky@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
arnd@...db.de, lambert.quentin@...il.com, gary.hook@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr,
weiyongjun1@...wei.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: amd-sp: introduce the AMD Secure Processor
device
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:08:11PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The CCP device is part of the AMD Secure Processor. In order to expand the
> usage of the AMD Secure Processor, create a framework that allows functional
> components of the AMD Secure Processor to be initialized and handled
> appropriately.
What do you mean by "framework"? What is this for? Who is going to use
it? Don't add framework that is not ever used, otherwise we will just
delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/ccp/Kconfig | 1
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/Kconfig | 16 +-
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/Makefile | 11 +
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/ccp-dev-v3.c | 86 +++++-----
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/ccp-dev-v5.c | 72 ++++----
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/ccp-dev.c | 137 +++++++++-------
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/ccp-dev.h | 35 ----
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-dev.c | 309 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-dev.h | 141 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-pci.c | 325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-platform.c | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 1225 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-dev.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-dev.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-pci.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/amd-sp/sp-platform.c
This patch makes no sense, you need to break it up into "do one logical
thing", as that is NOT what is happening here. It's impossible to
review as-is, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists