linux-kernel - Re: UM: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c489db68-af97-fd8b-ff90-32ce833883dd@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:44:13 +0000
From:   Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Anton Ivanov <aivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UM: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

How about tackling some real problems and performance issues instead?

There are a few of those in the network, interrupt and memory 
subsystems. Take your pick.

A.


On 19/01/17 17:13, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> please don't send drive-by patches.
> Would you dare to take another look at the published update steps
> in any other software combination?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>