linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] UM: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170120051124.GA9786@parts.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:11:24 -0500
From:   Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Anton Ivanov <aivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] UM: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

The kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), ...) => kmalloc(sizeof(*foo), ...)
ones are OK.

The rest is cargo-cult programming.

				Jeff
-- 
Jeff Dike
AddToIt
978-254-0789 (o)
978-394-8986 (c)