[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXkQ6sSw=oQcxUBi0hbZ1_tjc9mx55HvJ1mLPwJoHyDZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:44:38 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Gideon Israel Dsouza <gidisrael@...il.com>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:31 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Gideon,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on m68k/for-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170119]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gideon-Israel-Dsouza/compiler-gcc-h-Added-new-macro-for-gcc-attribute/20170120-032332
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git for-next
> config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
Hmm, although Gideon seems to have use git-send-email, there's no
"In-Reply-To" header in the email containing the second patch, hence
the kbuild test robot didn't consider the dependency on the first
patch...
Gideon: what exactly did you use to send this emai series?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists