linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:51:26 +0530
From:   "Gideon D'souza" <gidisrael@...il.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        "kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h

> Gideon: what exactly did you use to send this email series?
I used git format-patch and then send-email on my Fedora 24 system.

I did :

git format-patch HEAD^^ # this generated two patches for the two commits I made
git send-email --to ... ~/patches/0001- .... #sent first patch
git send-email --to ... ~/patches/0002- ....#sent second patch

Yes, I sent each patch individually. Should I have just passed the directory?


On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:31 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>> Hi Gideon,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on m68k/for-next]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170119]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gideon-Israel-Dsouza/compiler-gcc-h-Added-new-macro-for-gcc-attribute/20170120-032332
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git for-next
>> config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>
> Hmm, although Gideon seems to have use git-send-email, there's no
> "In-Reply-To" header in the email containing the second patch, hence
> the kbuild test robot didn't consider the dependency on the first
> patch...
>
> Gideon: what exactly did you use to send this emai series?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds