linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lgu5r653.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:30:16 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
        Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
        Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
        Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341

Hi Gregory,

Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> writes:

> If there a series about to be merged I can rebase my series on it. Else
> I propose to keep it and convert the family check to ops when you will
> send the series for it.

I am reworking the VTU operations, but not these port operations yet.
I will take care of converting the family checks once I'm done, don't
worry ;)

> I confirm that 6141 and 6341 are called Topaz. Actually I can add the
> support for the 6141 too, it is just a matter of adding an ID and maybe
> removing some ops as 6141 is a subset of 6341.

I don't mind having a patch adding support for only one chip at a time,
that is up to you.

Thanks,

        Vivien