[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8760l9641t.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:21:02 +0100
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341
Hi Vvien and Andrew,
On ven., janv. 20 2017, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:26:03PM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> writes:
>>
>> > +static bool mv88e6xxx_6341_family(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
>> > +{
>> > + return chip->info->family == MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341;
>> > +}
>>
>> I don't want to see these erronous family checks anymore, but I cannot
>> blame you for adding it since not all the code is moved to ops yet ;)
If there a series about to be merged I can rebase my series on it. Else
I propose to keep it and convert the family check to ops when you will
send the series for it.
>>
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6165, /* 6123 6161 6165 */
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6185, /* 6108 6121 6122 6131 6152 6155 6182 6185 */
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6320, /* 6320 6321 */
>> > + MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341, /* 6141 6341 */
>>
>> Maybe I missed it, Andrew, can you confirm that 6341 is a proper Marvell
>> family of switch chips?
>
> My understand is that it is. Marvell have not added it to DSDT. There
> is a new SDK called UMSD, also GPLv2 and BSD. They call this family
> Topaz, and the 6390 is Peridot.
I confirm that 6141 and 6341 are called Topaz. Actually I can add the
support for the 6141 too, it is just a matter of adding an ID and maybe
removing some ops as 6141 is a subset of 6341.
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists