[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170124000426.GA24835@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:04:26 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 4/5] tpm: split out tpm-dev.c into
tpm-dev.c and tpm-common-dev.c
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:45:58PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> Why don't you start by doubling the timeout? If nothing notices,
> chances are nothing relies on this aspect of the interface and it can
> be easily removed.
Okay, fair enough, with a print I think it solves my concern. I sent a patch.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists