[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170124142840.2lvdpw2ediriqfra@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:28:40 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 4/5] tpm: split out tpm-dev.c into tpm-dev.c and
tpm-common-dev.c
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:47:54AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:44:32AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>
> I really think we should not use the ugly read/write interface for any
> new things.
>
> Still unconvinced we should add a new cdev at this point.. But seeing
> seesion support certainl is encouraging..
>
> Jason
We can then revisit the interface once my patch set includes
the full functionality inluding the session management.
It's only a tiny portion of the implementation and can be
switched at any point.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists