linux-kernel - Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bfd4c8a3-4246-b8c5-ca3d-429d6f1f13f7@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:31:39 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in
 kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()

> It's just not possible to discuss things with you.

I wonder about your conclusion. We have got just different software
development opinions on some details.

I assume that a few additional dialogue techniques could help a bit more
in our communication difficulties.

 
> If other people want to merge your patches to KVM, they are free to do so.

I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up
in a constructive way.

Regards,
Markus