[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <14EAE124-D504-4480-A6D4-EB7EFFC3C561@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:16:20 +0300
From: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Huang Tao <huangtao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] clocksource/drivers/rockchip_timer: split bc_timer into rk_timer and rk_clock_event_device
> 24 янв. 2017 г., в 18:02, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> написал(а):
>
> Please don't add Reviewed-by tags without explicit mention of them by
> reviewers. (Also it's spelled wrong).
>
> I haven't looked that deeply into the driver itself and the changes made to
> feel comfortable with a "Reviewed-by".
Than I posted another linux code I was asked to add such tags (and others)
to add credits to people.
Sorry for that.
v6? or feel free to drop any tags during merge.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists