linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] clocksource/drivers/rockchip_timer: split bc_timer into rk_timer and rk_clock_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:30:13 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
        Huang Tao <huangtao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] clocksource/drivers/rockchip_timer: split bc_timer into rk_timer and rk_clock_event_device

Hi Alexander,

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017, 18:16:20 CET schrieb Alexander Kochetkov:
> > 24 янв. 2017 г., в 18:02, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> написал(а):
> > 
> > Please don't add Reviewed-by tags without explicit mention of them by
> > reviewers. (Also it's spelled wrong).
> > 
> > I haven't looked that deeply into the driver itself and the changes made
> > to
> > feel comfortable with a "Reviewed-by".
> 
> Than I posted another linux code I was asked to add such tags (and others)
> to add credits to people.
> 
> Sorry for that.

no problem. In general people reviewing patches will respond to the patch with 
tags they are comfortable with being added. And a Reviewed-by is a pretty 
strong tag, indicating that some thought went into reviewing a specific patch, 
which I hadn't done with my cursory glance at the time :-)

Heiko