linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for the ethernet switch on the ESPRESSObin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:08:03 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jason@...edaemon.net,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nadavh@...vell.com,
        dingwei@...vell.com, kostap@...vell.com, shjzhou@...vell.com,
        jpannell@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for the ethernet switch on the ESPRESSObin

Hi Gregory,

Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> writes:

> Hi David,
>  
>  On ven., janv. 20 2017, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:49:32 +0100
>>
>>> I created a new family for this switch and filled the ops structure
>>> by selecting which seems the more appropriate functions. I rebased
>>> the series on net-next/master which allowed me to benefit to the
>>> eeprom functions introduced for the 6390.
>>
>> It looks like there will be at least one more respin of this series,
>> specifically to remove the new family as Vivien seems to object to
>> this.
>
> I am about to send a new version. However about removing the new family,
> I thought that with the confirmation from Andrew we could keep it.
>
> Vivien could you confirm this?

I confirm.

Thanks!

        Vivien