linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for the ethernet switch on the ESPRESSObin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170124195712.GS10895@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:57:12 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jason@...edaemon.net, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nadavh@...vell.com,
        dingwei@...vell.com, kostap@...vell.com, shjzhou@...vell.com,
        jpannell@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for the ethernet switch on the
 ESPRESSObin

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:47:06PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi David,
>  
>  On ven., janv. 20 2017, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:49:32 +0100
> >
> >> I created a new family for this switch and filled the ops structure
> >> by selecting which seems the more appropriate functions. I rebased
> >> the series on net-next/master which allowed me to benefit to the
> >> eeprom functions introduced for the 6390.
> >
> > It looks like there will be at least one more respin of this series,
> > specifically to remove the new family as Vivien seems to object to
> > this.
> 
> I am about to send a new version. However about removing the new family,
> I thought that with the confirmation from Andrew we could keep it.

Hi Gregory

Yes, keep it. It will hopefully be short lived, but it is needed at
the moment.

    Andrew