[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfaX=WLc-tLCXOwcs2t5fHfoYHZpeL6CMLKU1xQyBjMRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:15:10 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
> The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give
> users this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Looks okay to me.
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> ---
> This was discussed almost one year ago, with no clear conclusion, but
> also no evidence that the driver can't be built as a module. Is there
> any way to push this forward?
>
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-4.7-rc7.orig/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:36.024835842 +0200
> +++ linux-4.7-rc7/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:44.735904433 +0200
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> #
>
> config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL
> - bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
> + tristate "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
> depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI
> select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> select PINMUX
>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists