[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfaG96BgwM2S6Mw3Uv=DcLrV1id7nyMzrk9xSreT_ZAEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:29:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: core: helper function to detect slave mode
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:50:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 21:45 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > > + * i2c_slave_mode_detect - detect operation mode
>> >
>> > I'd rather name it 'i2c_detect_slave_mode'
>>
>> When I proposed that I kept in ming `git grep -n i2c_slave`.
>
> "i2c.*slave"? :)
'i2c[a-z_]\+slave'
> I think having the verb first makes function names more comprehensible.
> i2c-core is not super consistent with that, but I'd say more follow this
> than not.
I'm okay with either.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists