linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] compiler-gcc.h: Added new macro for gcc attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:20:07 +0530
From:   "Gideon D'souza" <gidisrael@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] compiler-gcc.h: Added new macro for gcc attribute

>#define __mode(x)       __attribute__((mode(x)))
Well that's embarrassing. I so sorry for the trouble guys :( I'll resend this.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:44 +0530, Gideon Israel Dsouza wrote:
>> Added __mode(x) into compiler-gcc.h as part of a cleanup task I've
>> taken up, to replace gcc specific attributes with macros.
>>
>> Last accepted patch I sent into linux-next for crypto: d8c34b949d8c:
>> crypto: Replaced gcc specific attributes with macros from compiler.h
>>
>> The last commit of this task that went through you: 52f5684c8e1ec
>> kernel: use macros from compiler.h instead of __attribute__((...))
>>
>> The next patch is for cleaning up the m68k subsystem and it requires
>> a new macro to wrap __attribute__ ((mode (...)))
> []
>> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> []
>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@
>>  #define __attribute_const__  __attribute__((__const__))
>>  #define __maybe_unused               __attribute__((unused))
>>  #define __always_unused              __attribute__((unused))
>> +#define __mode                  __attribute__((mode(x)))
>
> Huh?
>
> Perhaps you meant
>
> #define __mode(x)       __attribute__((mode(x)))
>
> ?
>