[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeYxfuMuaZCMk+MYdxLTs7cCa6j6M7Ot3XnwMmeHP7kBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:01:18 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>, harba@...eaurora.org,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, msalter@...hat.com,
mlangsdo@...hat.com, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, astone@...hat.com,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
guohanjun@...wei.com,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 2/3] ACPI: Add support for ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias
<agustinv@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a ResourceSource to specify
> an alternate interrupt controller. Introduce acpi_irq_get and use it
> to implement ResourceSource/IRQ domain mapping.
>
> The new API is similar to of_irq_get and allows re-initialization
> of a platform resource from the ACPI extended IRQ resource, and
> provides proper behavior for probe deferral when the domain is not
> yet present when called.
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *result = NULL;
> + struct acpi_device *device;
> + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid;
> + struct acpi_device_id *devid;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + if (!source->string_length)
> + return acpi_gsi_domain_id;
> +
> + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle);
> + if (WARN_ON(ACPI_FAILURE(status)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle);
> + if (WARN_ON(!device))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
> + for (devid = &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table;
> + devid < &__dsdt_irqchip_acpi_probe_table_end; devid++) {
> + if (devid->id && !strcmp(devid->id, hwid->id)) {
> + result = &device->fwnode;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Looks like a candidate for linker table API. (I recommend to Cc Luis
for this part)
> + }
> +/**
> + * acpi_irq_parse_one_match - Handle a matching IRQ resource.
> + * @fwnode: matching fwnode
> + * @hwirq: hardware IRQ number
> + * @triggering: triggering attributes of hwirq
> + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq
> + * @polarity: polarity attributes of hwirq
> + * @shareable: shareable attributes of hwirq
> + * @ctx: acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx updated by this function
> + *
> + * Description:
> + * Handle a matching IRQ resource by populating the given ctx with
> + * the information passed.
> + */
> +static inline void acpi_irq_parse_one_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + u32 hwirq, u8 triggering,
> + u8 polarity, u8 shareable,
> + struct acpi_irq_parse_one_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + if (!fwnode)
> + return;
> + ctx->rc = 0;
Perhaps ctx->rc = fwnode ? 0 : -EINVAL; ?
> + *ctx->res_flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable);
> + ctx->fwspec->fwnode = fwnode;
> + ctx->fwspec->param[0] = hwirq;
> + ctx->fwspec->param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(triggering, polarity);
> + ctx->fwspec->param_count = 2;
> +}
> +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res)
> +{
> + struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = acpi_irq_parse_one(handle, index, &fwspec, &flags);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwspec.fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
> + if (!domain)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> + rc = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec);
> + if (rc <= 0)
Is rc = 0 an error?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + res->start = rc;
> + res->end = rc;
> + res->flags = flags;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get);
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
> + if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = acpi_irq_get(ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev), num, r);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI
#if IS_ENABLED()
> +int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index, struct resource *res);
> +#else
> +static inline int acpi_irq_get(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int index,
> + struct resource *res)
Perhaps
static inline
int ...
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists