linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ACPI: Generic GSI: Do not attempt to map non-GSI IRQs during bus scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdTnjupjzWyc27JPi_wUsd=+q-4FuzRV=WvjfSe1HdoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:47:09 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>, harba@...eaurora.org,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, msalter@...hat.com,
        mlangsdo@...hat.com, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, astone@...hat.com,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        guohanjun@...wei.com,
        Charles Garcia-Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ACPI: Generic GSI: Do not attempt to map non-GSI
 IRQs during bus scan

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Agustin Vega-Frias
<agustinv@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to specify
> an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is
> incorrect, so just disable the platform resource.
>
> Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional
> on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 platforms,
> in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly.

> @@ -43,6 +43,19 @@ static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res)
>  acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; }
>  #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI

#if IS_ENABLED() ?

> +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq)
> +{
> +       return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0 &&
> +              ext_irq->producer_consumer == ACPI_CONSUMER;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq)
> +{
> +       return true;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io)
>  {
>         u64 reslen = end - start + 1;
> @@ -470,9 +483,12 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
>                         acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
>                         return false;
>                 }
> -               acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index],

> +               if (is_gsi(ext_irq))
> +                       acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index],
>                                          ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity,
>                                          ext_irq->sharable, false);
> +               else
> +                       acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0);

And why not to create a helper called acpi_dev_get_gsi_irqresource()
instead of that one?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko