[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZebsd5MfARWL2WbKkAuXfjEe6p_k5tYwPFF6kSsCXDdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:13:10 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soc: samsung: Drivers for v4.11
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> Few changes in Exynos PMU driver including one that is needed by pinctrl
> driver for runtime PM. We want to move forward with the RPM for our drivers
> while keeping still DT ABI.
>
> This tag is also for Linus Walleij to pull - base for pinctrl changes.
Do I need it? I.e. will my branch not compile without this, or is this
just a runtime problem?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists