[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4be96fae-6790-d281-61dc-f7e7cde9efb7@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:20:25 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soc: samsung: Drivers for v4.11
Hi Linus,
On 2017-01-26 10:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Few changes in Exynos PMU driver including one that is needed by pinctrl
>> driver for runtime PM. We want to move forward with the RPM for our drivers
>> while keeping still DT ABI.
>>
>> This tag is also for Linus Walleij to pull - base for pinctrl changes.
> Do I need it? I.e. will my branch not compile without this, or is this
> just a runtime problem?
"[PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from
mach-exynos to the
pinctrl driver" has compile time dependency on the changes included in
that tag.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists