[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbKfojW-adLDL5Y7UQNps9H=5NpwWnYOzC5xBo9Bq1RJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:44:25 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] soc: samsung: Drivers for v4.11
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On 2017-01-26 10:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Few changes in Exynos PMU driver including one that is needed by pinctrl
>>> driver for runtime PM. We want to move forward with the RPM for our
>>> drivers
>>> while keeping still DT ABI.
>>>
>>> This tag is also for Linus Walleij to pull - base for pinctrl changes.
>>
>> Do I need it? I.e. will my branch not compile without this, or is this
>> just a runtime problem?
>
>
> "[PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos
> to the
> pinctrl driver" has compile time dependency on the changes included in that
> tag.
Is that because of the custom syscon regmap lookup function?
I just complained about that in a separate mail ;)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists