linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a1ef925-a217-31b6-ada7-4a2a0dfae51f@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 06:22:20 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        fengguang.wu@...el.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>> [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?
>>>
>>> Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and
>>> defconfig.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
>>>> a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.
>>>>
>>>> If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.
>>>>
>>>> [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
>>>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/
>>>
>>> If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool
>>> front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be
>>> great.  With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to
>>> just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts.
>>>
>>
>> Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested
>> in the following breakage as well (seen in -next).
>>
>> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata':
>> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'
>>
>> Reported on kerneltests.org.
>
> Thanks Guenter,
>
> Is this for me of Paul?
>
Paul, sorry.

Guenter