[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485440636.15964.47.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:23:56 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/fpu: Simplify the fpu->last_cpu logic and
rename it to fpu->fpregs_cached
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 12:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> @@ -322,6 +308,16 @@ struct fpu {
> unsigned char fpregs_active;
>
> /*
> + * @fpregs_cached:
> + *
> + * This flag tells us whether this context is loaded into a
> CPU
> + * right now.
Not quite. You are still checking against fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx.
How about something like
* This flag tells us whether this context was loaded into
* its current CPU; fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx will tell us whether
* this context is actually in the registers.
> + *
> + * This is set to 0 if a task is migrated to another CPU.
> + */
> + unsigned char fpregs_cached;
> +
> + /*
> * @state:
> *
> * In-memory copy of all FPU registers that we save/restore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists