lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:39:55 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_event_for_each

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:30:12PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The following program triggers use-after-free in perf_event_for_each:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/f1c354a8356e42f4d0b3d912e1bec956/raw/31d7ecdf6dc2c7327b80ef8581a39c823bbe405d/gistfile1.txt
> 
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_event_for_each_child+0x15f/0x180
> kernel/events/core.c:4495 at addr ffff8800680ec248

The below seems to fix things for me.

---
Subject: perf: Fix use-after-free

Dmitry reported a KASAN use-after-free.

XXX: do a changelog

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 896aa53..8c1ad98 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1474,7 +1474,6 @@ ctx_group_list(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 static void
 list_add_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 {
-
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CONTEXT);
@@ -1629,6 +1628,8 @@ static void perf_group_attach(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct perf_event *group_leader = event->group_leader, *pos;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&event->ctx->lock);
+
 	/*
 	 * We can have double attach due to group movement in perf_event_open.
 	 */
@@ -1702,6 +1703,8 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
 	struct perf_event *sibling, *tmp;
 	struct list_head *list = NULL;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&event->ctx->lock);
+
 	/*
 	 * We can have double detach due to exit/hot-unplug + close.
 	 */
@@ -1900,9 +1903,29 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event,
  */
 static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&event->ctx->mutex);
+	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
 
 	event_function_call(event, __perf_remove_from_context, (void *)flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * The above event_function_call() can NO-OP when it hits
+	 * TASK_TOMBSTONE. In that case we must already have been detached
+	 * from the context (by perf_event_exit_event()) but the grouping
+	 * might still be in-tact.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CONTEXT);
+	if ((flags & DETACH_GROUP) &&
+	    (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_GROUP)) {
+		/*
+		 * Since in that case we cannot possibly be scheduled, simply
+		 * detach now.
+		 */
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+		perf_group_detach(event);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+	}
 }
 
 /*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists